Pico2DVI Graphics Card Turns RP2350 Into a DIY Video Adapter
on
The Pico2DVI graphics card is a DIY video adapter built around the Raspberry Pi Pico 2 W (RP2350). It borrows the look of a PCIe add-in board, but it isn’t meant to accelerate a host PC. Instead, it’s a self-contained project: power the board externally, connect a display, and the Pico 2 W runs the show.
What the Pico2DVI Graphics Card Outputs
At the core, the Pico2DVI graphics card generates a DVI-compatible digital video stream over an HDMI-style connector.
That’s the interesting bit: pushing a microcontroller into the territory of high-speed video signalling, timing closure, and tight pixel pipelines. The design also adds 32 MB of external video RAM to move beyond the small, “microcontroller-sized” memory budgets that normally limit framebuffers, tile maps, fonts, and animation assets.
Why the Hardware Is the Story
The project documentation digs into SPI timing, throughput constraints, and the practical realities of routing fast digital signals on a PCB. It’s the kind of build where trace discipline and clock margins matter, not just “does the code compile”. There’s also an intentionally ridiculous cooling angle: the board is designed to tolerate aggressive overclocking (in service of stable video output), and the “sub-zero” concept stacks a heatsink, a compact fan, and a hinted Peltier layer as a nod to PC overclocking culture. If you want the original project overview, the step-by-step build write-up, and the source files, they’re linked from the overview, the build guide, and the source repository.
How It Fits the Pico Video Ecosystem
If you’ve been following microcontroller-driven DVI experiments, the Pico2DVI graphics card is a natural escalation: more PCB real estate, more RAM, and more ambition for “render something useful” projects (think dashboards, retro-style UIs, and network-fed displays) rather than raw benchmark speed.
For background on Pico-era DVI output approaches and related hardware, see our previous coverage and the related review.

Discussion (0 comments)