A breakthrough for second-generation biofuels

July 1, 2010 | 00:00

A breakthrough for second-generation biofuels

Dutch companies have developed a new technology that could become a breakthrough in the use of wood residues in electricity generation. By perfecting the so-called torrefaction process, they are able to achieve industrial-scale production of “bio-coal” pellets that can be used as a perfect substitute for coal in coal-fired power plants. RWE Innogy, the renewable energy subsidiary of the giant German utility RWE, has invested several millions in the technology. RWE Innogy is now building a €120 million wood pellet plant for the production of biomass pellets in Georgia in the US, which is likely to use torrefaction in the future. According to Leonhard Birnbaum, Board Member of RWE, the new product has the potential ‘to decarbonise our existing coal power infrastructure’.

Birnbaum was one of the guests, together with Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs Maria van der Hoeven, at the ground-breaking ceremony last Monday of Europe’s first commercial-scale plant for the production of bio-coal pellets in the Dutch town of Duiven near Arnhem. The €15 million plant, which will be operational in 2011 and will have an initial production capacity of 60,000 tons, is being built by Topell Nederland, a joint-venture of Topell Energy (50.1%) and RWE Innogy (49.9%). Also present at the ceremony was Peter Terium, CEO of the largest Dutch utility Essent, which was acquired last year by RWE for €7.3 billion, and which will be the main buyer of the bio-coal.

But the investment of RWE Innogy in Dutch technology company Topell dates from two years ago, i.e. well before RWE’s takeover of Essent. In fact, it was the very first venture capital investment that RWE Innogy ever made. ‘The event today shows that our decision to invest in Topell was right’, said Birnbaum. ‘Our intention’, he added, ‘was to commercialise a new process for the production of efficient bio-coal, which significantly improves and extends the potential applications of biomass.’

The process Birnbaum referred to is called torrefaction, a thermo-chemical treatment of biomass that removes water and volatiles from the raw material and ultimately produces a solid fuel that resembles coal and is therefore called bio-coal. In the Netherlands this technology is far advanced, in part thanks to the activities of research institutions such as ECN (Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands) and KEMA. ECN has built a demonstration plant together with Vattenfall. Patrick Bergman of ECN, one of the foremost torrefaction experts in the world, is joining Topell, which is one of four Dutch companies that are currently building torrefaction plants. The other ones are FoxCoal, Torr-Coal Technology and Stramproy Green Technology. FoxCoal, Torr-Coal and Topell have together formed the Dutch Torrefaction Association.

Whole world

According to Ewout Maaskant, CEO of Topell Energy, his newly to be built factory in Duiven is ‘one of the first and largest torrefaction plants in the world’. He expects Topell’s production capacity to be scaled up to 80,000 or even 100,000 tons. ’60,000 tons is just a first step’, he notes. ‘Torrefaction is new. It can be employed at scale. We are in a hurry.’

A case study from consultancy DHV and the University of Groningen shows that the CO2-emissions from the entire production chain that Topell uses are 49 grams per ton. This compares to 760 grams CO2 per ton for traditional coal-fired power production, says Maaskant. The costs of the bio-coal pellets will be roughly equivalent to €7.50 per Gigajoule, which compares to current prices of €4.50-5.00 per Gigajoule for coal-fired power, but this excludes CO2-costs. The Topell factory gets a €1 million subsidy from the government, but this money is intended only to enable the use of very low-grade – and usually very wet – biomass, such as grass, in the torrefaction process. In addition, the electricity producer who uses the bio-coal, in this case Essent, receives a subsidy of €61 per MWh from the Dutch government for producing this “green electricity”.

According to Maaskant, what is unique about the process used by Topell is in particular the heat transfer in the reactor, which he says is 10 or even a hundred times more effective than in other reactors. Topell has generated an enormous amount of interest from abroad. First deals regarding the sale of torrefaction plants are currently being negotiated. The company wants to build at least four new plants in the coming years in various countries, including the US. ‘Many serious companies, especially from North America and Asia, have started to invest time and resources in torrefaction’, says Maaskant. ‘That is why I am convinced torrefaction is going to be a breakthrough in second-generation biofuels.’ (Second-generation biofuels are made from raw materials that cannot be used for food, unlike so-called first-generation biofuels such as ethanol from corn, which do compete with the food chain.)

Too limited

Birnbaum notes that the bio-coal pellets produced with the torrefaction process have several major advantages. ‘The process developed by Topell enables the continuous production of bio-coal pellets on an industrial scale. The manufacturing process is highly flexible in terms of raw material input. The bio-coal pellets have a significantly higher density and caloric value than woodchips and much more homgeneous combustion properties. This is why they can easily be transported, stored and burned with coal.’

Thanks to their unique properties, the bio-coal pellets require no additional, costly infrastructural measures, such as separate storage or pulverisation, when co-fired with conventional coal. For RWE this is a particularly important consideration, since the company is one of the largest coal-power producers in Europe and is looking for ways to reduce its CO2 emissions. Hence, Birnbaum says that ‘this technology can decarbonise our existing infrastructure.’

Birnbaum’s assessment was confirmed by Essent-CEO Peter Terium, who had some news of his own on Monday. He announced that Essent had carried out a successful test in which the Amer coal-fired power plant in the Netherlands used 50% biomass. ‘It is the first time in the world that a coal-fired

‘If you look at economics, biomass simply scores better’

power plant achieves this level of substitution’, Terium said. At this moment, Essent achieves an average of almost 28% co-firing of biomass at the Amer plant, which makes this the largest biomass power plant in Europe, according to Essent. Amer combusted 761,000 tons of biomass in 2009, delivering 1680 GWh of green electricity. The 50% co-firing was a test result, said Terium. To achieve this level permanently, additional invesments are required. Essent intends to realise those in the next few years.

But for RWE, with its huge power generation capacity, the ability of the Netherlands to deliver bio-coal is much too limited. Regions like North America and Eastern Europe have of course much more raw material available. That is why RWE Innogy is now building what is one of the largest plants for the manufacture of biomass pellets in the world – in Georgia in the US. This has a capacity of 750,000 tons and will cost €120 million. The wood pellets produced in Georgia will find its way to RWE’s many coal-fired power plants in Europe.

Biomass can’t be missed

Biofuels have come under a lot of criticism recently, so much so that they have become regarded as much less desirable than for example wind or solar power. But according to Leonhard Birnbaum, board member of RWE, Europe will not be able to achieve its CO2 targets for 2020 without a substantial contribution from biomass. He points out that the market for solid biomass is different from the liquid biomass market. ‘We will not repeat situations like the palm oil disaster in Indonesia’, says Birnbaum.

According to the RWE-executive, biomass has important advantages over other renewable energies. ‘It can be used at a large scale. It is reliable, in the sense that it does not depend on intermittent sources like the wind or the sun. It can be used as a direct substitute for coal. And what is also very important, it can be used not just for electricity, but also for heating.’ But most important of all, says Birnbaum, ‘biomass is the most economic form of renewable energy. If you look at economics, biomass simply scores better. If we are serious about reducing CO2 emissions at affordable costs, biomass needs to be part of the solution.’ Birnbaum is critical of the massive subsidies the German government puts into photovoltaic power. ‘This way you achieve much less with much more money.’

He gets support from Jurriaan Ruys, Partner of McKinsey, who also spoke at the opening ceremony in Duiven. According to Ruys, ‘biomass will be necessary to achieve the EU’s 20/20/20 targets. It can’t be done with wind, wave and solar power alone’. Ruys says the use of biomass in power production in Europe must at least be doubled by 2020 from 800 TWh to 1600 TWh if the EU is to achieve its targets. He thinks that a cost reduction of 15 to 40% is still possible. He also points out that heavy trucks, planes and ships cannot be run on batteries.

But Ruys acknowledges that biomass has its problems. ‘Mankind has used biomass for thousands of years, but so far it has not been used at scale. Then the supply chain is very fragmented. The demand picture is uncertain. And there have been issues with land use and biodversity. So there is still a long way to go.’

 

Loading comments...
related items